EV-0441 — The National Archives: Enquiry on BP Properties Ltd v Buckler land dispute records (31 Jan 2026–8 Feb 2026)

page · Updated 2026-10-21T20:24:22 · Original source

EV IDEV-0441
InstitutionThe National Archives
MatterEnquiry on BP Properties Ltd v Buckler land dispute records
Route / regimeEmail · records enquiry
Their referenceCAS-313954-Y6C0H3 CRM:052900508; CRM:022601115; CRM:022601127
Request date31 Jan 2026
Statutory deadlineNo statutory deadline applies
Deadlineno statutory deadline
First reply (not an acknowledgement)6 Feb 2026
Days waited6
Response class“not held”
Exemptions citednone cited
Redirected toCentral Land Registry; local/county archives
Fees or charges named—
Messages5 sent · 2 received (0 acknowledgements only)
Attachments from the institution0 archived

About this page type → Read the Docs · All requests (disclosure record) · Dartboard: disclosure record

Timeline

DateDirectionClassSummaryCopy
31 Jan 2026→ to institutionrequestRequester asks whether disputed land ownership before 1987 registration is relevant to archival or historical record considerations.email · text
6 Feb 2026← from institutionredirected elsewhereInstitution states it is unlikely to hold the requested land case records and directs requester to other bodies and research guides.email · text
6 Feb 2026→ to institutionclarification givenRequester clarifies the enquiry concerns BP Properties Ltd v Buckler and asks about archival protocols for disputed land ownership.email · text
6 Feb 2026← from institutionnot heldInstitution explains it does not annotate disputed records and confirms searched judicial series contain no relevant material.email · text
6 Feb 2026→ to institutionclarification givenRequester details 1974 proceedings and asks procedural questions about archival silence and incomplete court records.email · text
8 Feb 2026→ to institutioncomplaintRequester raises concerns of evidence tampering, cites recollection, and asks about Bute Estate and BP corporate records.email · text
8 Feb 2026→ to institutionclarification givenRequester corrects a prior date claim, introduces a forensic report, and renews questions about naming and record transfers.email · text

Note: Institution states relevant judicial series contain no material and does not annotate disputed records.

Cited on

3 pages link here.

Browse mirror index

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.