| EV ID | EV-0428 |
|---|---|
| Institution | Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee |
| Matter | Historic land registration governance concern submission |
| Route / regime | Email · political representation |
| Their reference | none given |
| Request date | 31 Jan 2026 |
| Statutory deadline | No statutory deadline applies |
| Deadline | no statutory deadline |
| First reply (not an acknowledgement) | 5 Feb 2026 |
| Days waited | 5 |
| Response class | redirected elsewhere |
| Exemptions cited | none cited |
| Redirected to | PHSO; local Member of Parliament |
| Fees or charges named | — |
| Messages | 2 sent · 3 received (1 acknowledgements only) |
| Attachments from the institution | 0 archived |
About this page type → Read the Docs · All requests (disclosure record) · Dartboard: disclosure record
Timeline
| Date | Direction | Class | Summary | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31 Jan 2026 | → to institution | request | The requester outlines a historical land registration dispute and asks the Committee to consider it as a systemic governance concern. | email · text |
| 31 Jan 2026 | ← from institution | acknowledgement only | An automated reply confirms receipt and notes the Committee does not investigate individual cases. | email · text |
| 5 Feb 2026 | ← from institution | correspondence (no disclosure) | The clerk states the matter falls outside the Committee's remit, which covers constitutional issues, civil service administration, and PHSO reports. | email · text |
| 5 Feb 2026 | → to institution | clarification given | The requester contests the remit decision, providing further background and arguing the matter concerns constitutional and administrative failures. | email · text |
| 5 Feb 2026 | ← from institution | redirected elsewhere | An automated response reiterates the Committee cannot review individual PHSO cases and directs the requester to the PHSO or their MP. | email · text |
Note: Correspondence to a parliamentary select committee about a historical land dispute was repeatedly held to be outside the committee's remit.