The full history of Great House Farm (Tŷ Mawr), from the records, is in the e-books: first edition free →

Alfred Thomas’s 1927 death conflicts with Mary Williams’s remembered 1928 rent payment

OBS-0004 · chronology and title chain · working observation

Summary

Mary (Nancy) Williams’s c.1974 statement places the last rent payment, about £4 per annum, in 1928 and names “Alfred Thomas the son of Daniel Thomas” as recipient. The Dictionary of Welsh Biography records Alfred Thomas, 1st Baron Pontypridd, as dying unmarried on 14 December 1927. A separate, secondary transcription of a 27 December 1927 newspaper report says an unofficial report had the bulk of his property going to Cardiff Corporation and citizens. The conflict is material, but neither the actual 1928 payee nor any Llandough land passing under Alfred’s estate is established.

Analysis

Keep the evidence strands separate. First, verify the death and identity through the Dictionary of Welsh Biography and its cited contemporary sources. Second, preserve Mary’s exact statement and her assertion that she saw the receipt, while cataloguing the receipt itself as pending/not located. Third, establish whether the 1928 payment was actually made to an estate, executor, authorised agent, or another person; do not silently rewrite Mary’s wording. Fourth, inspect the original newspaper report, will, grant and estate accounts before interpreting the Cardiff Corporation bequest. The phrase “bulk of his property” does not identify assets or prove that a Llandough parcel was included. The absence of a located transfer to Cardiff Corporation does not prove that no property passed. The 23 February 1905 Bute-to-Cardiff Corporation conveyance is a separate title-chain lead and may explain the Corporation’s later appearance independently of Alfred’s estate. Also compare the 10 November 1925 quarry-plant/tramline sale catalogue (DSA/12/4888), the 1927 obituary wording that the limeworks were carried on by Alfred and then given up, the 1877 Bute–Thomas instrument, and the later Court of Appeal recital of rent arrears/1953 payment. Each source has a different evidential role; no one item resolves the conflict.

Limits and alternative explanations

This is a research observation, not a finding of fraud, concealment, inheritance or ownership. The receipt, 1877 instrument/plan, original 1927 newspaper, will, grant and relevant estate/rent accounts have not been inspected here. The press report is expressly unofficial in the transcription. Do not claim Alfred personally received a payment after his death; do not claim Cardiff Corporation inherited or did not inherit the Great House Farm land without asset-specific proof.

Tests and questions

  • Can the original 1928 rent receipt or rent book be located, and what exact date, payee, collecting person, amount and land description does it show?
  • What is the exact identity of the Alfred Thomas named by Mary, and is it securely the Alfred who died on 14 December 1927?
  • What do the original 1927 newspaper report, Alfred’s will, the grant and estate accounts actually say about beneficiaries and assets?
  • Does the 1928 grant/Gazette reference (reported as 8 March 1928; Gazette notice reportedly 30 March 1928, p.2387) verify on inspection?
  • Do Cardiff Corporation’s deeds/property registers or 1928 minutes record land or a property interest at Llandough received from Alfred’s estate?
  • What does the separate 23 February 1905 Bute-to-Cardiff Corporation conveyance and plan cover, and is it sufficient to explain the Corporation’s later appearance?
  • Does the original 1877 Bute–Thomas instrument identify a reverter, rent mechanism, parcel extent or quarrying condition that explains the remembered 1928 change?
  • How do the Court of Appeal’s rent-arrears and 1953-payment references map to the actual parcel and tenancy?

Underlying artifact references

Existing analysis: Read the related page

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.