EV-0039 — WGR Tenancy Offers Concerning Remaining House and Garden (1959 and 1965)

page · Updated 2026-10-24T07:55:09 · Original source

EV IDEV-0039
TitleWGR Tenancy Offers Concerning Remaining House and Garden (1959 and 1965)
Date of document1959 and 1965
Typelease/tenancy
Evidence labelPRIMARY DOCUMENT — NOT PUBLISHED HERE
Repository / referenceHolder not located; WGR and solicitors’ files
StatusPENDING — Original not located. WGR and solicitors’ files are likely holders. No retrieval method or cost given.
ProvenanceNo copy held; Placeholder marked ‘not yet obtained’, no evidence object, preview or transcription; Lists Buckler family evidence repository as custodian/source link.
Wiki catalogue pageGHF-E128
Claims that rely on thisClaim: Repeated attempts to frame Mary (Nancy) Williams’s Parcel A occupation as permiss, Western Ground Rents Ltd — Forensic Assessment

Proves: Not held, so nothing yet. Reported: as recited (citing the 1962 page), offers in 1959 and 1965 referred to the remaining occupied house-and-garden area; Court of Appeal states Mary refused a 1959 tenancy offer and claimed ownership.

Does not prove: Land described, terms, whether Mary answered in writing, and ‘whole farm’ wording are unknown; No link to the south-east green or to WGR treating the rest of the land as settled in 1955.

Interpretation: working hypotheses

Working hypotheses, kept apart from the record above. The record text on this page is unchanged. None of these is a finding: each line is labelled as inference, theory, a reading that cuts against the case, or a discarded theory, and names the evidence it rests on and what would confirm or refute it, so the reader can test it. Updated 25 Oct 2026 (v2: ingredients wording).

Demolition, archaeology and the green

DISCARDED THEORY · H-06DISCARDED: the theory that the March 1965 offer to Mrs Buckler was of the eastern fields her husband had held, not the farmhouse. Reason: the only offer to her the judgment describes is "of the farmhouse and garden"; logged as the family's hypothesis with the record point.

Rests on: EV-0039 (this page) · EV-0080 · research log E104

Would be confirmed by: Would be revived by the agents' 1965 file naming the fields.

Would be refuted by: Refuted on the judgment's summary unless the file shows otherwise.

Status: Discarded

Cited on

50 pages link here.

Browse mirror index

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.