| EV ID | EV-0073 |
|---|---|
| Title | Family / solicitors’ litigation file, 1984–87 proceedings |
| Date of document | 1984–87 |
| Type | court record |
| Evidence label | PRIMARY DOCUMENT — NOT PUBLISHED HERE |
| Repository / reference | Family archive, predecessor solicitors, SRA trace and relevant court/archive holdings. Wiki catalogue reference: FC-005. |
| Status | PENDING — Sources named: family archive, predecessor solicitors, SRA trace, relevant court/archive holdings. Aim: recover pleadings, disclosure lists, trial bundles, correspondence, instructions. No cost stated. |
| Provenance | No copy held. As of 10 October 2026 no inline evidence image or source-file link existed; Absence does not establish no custodian holds a record. |
| Wiki catalogue page | FC-005 |
| Claims that rely on this | Court of Appeal — Forensic Assessment, Darwin Gray — Forensic Assessment, Forensic Evidence Capture — Decisive Document Schedule & Dedicated Placeholders , ReOrg, GHF-E140 — High Court hearing 10 July 1986; judgment 24 July 1986 |
About this page type → Read the Docs
Proves: Not held, so nothing yet. Reported: identifies the 1984–87 litigation file as a decisive open target, described as central to any later argument of judgment obtained through fraud or material non-disclosure.
Does not prove: Does not show what parties pleaded on title, what was disclosed, whether 1938/1939 material was available, what BP knew, or what was before the Court of Appeal; Missing papers alone don’t prove fraud or non-disclosure.
