| EV ID | EV-0401 |
|---|---|
| Institution | Member of Parliament |
| Matter | Forwarded Land Registry response and follow-up queries |
| Route / regime | Email · political representation |
| Their reference | N610CGV |
| Request date | 19 Sep 2026 |
| Statutory deadline | No statutory deadline applies |
| Deadline | no statutory deadline |
| First reply (not an acknowledgement) | 18 Sep 2026 |
| Days waited | -1 |
| Response class | substantive disclosure |
| Exemptions cited | none cited |
| Redirected to | — |
| Fees or charges named | — |
| Messages | 3 sent · 2 received (1 acknowledgements only) |
| Attachments from the institution | 1 archived |
About this page type → Read the Docs · All requests (disclosure record) · Dartboard: disclosure record
Timeline
| Date | Direction | Class | Summary | Copy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Sep 2026 | ← from institution | substantive disclosure | Forwards a response from HM Land Registry's Chief Executive and states a Ministry of Justice reply is still awaited. | email · text · 2026-09-09_hmlr_chief-land-registrar-let (WB-0043) |
| 18 Sep 2026 | → to institution | clarification given | Provides residence and constituency details and further family and property history to support the casework request. | email · text |
| 19 Sep 2026 | → to institution | request | Raises further questions about whether HM Land Registry's 1982 first registration correctly identified the disputed parcel. | email · text |
| 20 Oct 2026 | → to institution | request | The requester asks the office to put three specific questions to HM Land Registry's Chief Executive and to check on the Ministry of Justice reply. | email · text |
| 20 Oct 2026 | ← from institution | acknowledgement only | Automatic reply acknowledges receipt and repeats requirement that the requester reside in the constituency. | email · text |
Attachments (Wayback archive)
- 18 Sep 2026: 2026-09-09_hmlr_chief-land-registrar-letter-to-mp.pdf — WB-0043 (113 KB)
Note: Office forwarded a Land Registry response; requester disputed it and raised further questions and a possible Ombudsman referral.
