‹
The Legal Wiki
2 of 23
›
HomeMain PageSearchCollaborateMedia Gallery
🟩 Farm & land
Great House Farm (Tŷ Mawr)The Two ParcelsWoodlandLlandough LimeworksArchaeology and Heritage1988: Possession and DemolitionRedevelopment and Church View Close
🩵 People
Mary (Nancy) WilliamsJohn WilliamsFrederick BucklerThe Williams / Buckler FamilyDaniel Thomas and Alfred Thomas
🟨 Landowners
Williams / BucklerBP Properties LtdThe Bute EstateWestern Ground Rents Ltd
🟪 Documents & cases
The 1877 AgreementThe 1916 Tenancy1938–39: Sale to WGR and the Revised TenancyThe 1955 Possession OrderThe 1962 Possession OrderThe 1974 Licence LettersBP Properties Ltd v BucklerLand Registry Titles
🟥 Scrutiny & Accountability
Scrutiny & AccountabilityMaster Scrutiny Issue Register (73 issues)
Procedural Fairness & Notice
1982–83 Registration & Opportunity to Object1987 HMLR Amalgamation During Appeal
Court & Judicial Issues
BP v Buckler: Scope, Decided & UndecidedPotential Miscarriage of Justice: Issue Register
Suspected Fraud & Concealment
Concealment, Missing Records & Disclosure
Forensic Reviews — Institutions, Companies & Individuals
HM Land Registry & Administrative DecisionsForensic Review Index — Courts, Archives & Public Authorities
Project records
Project office (PRINCE2): projects.bucklerfamily.estateDamages, Losses & Costs QuantificationReparations Schedule & Proposed ApportionmentFOI & Records Requests — Backstory, Status and Forward Plan1986–87 Solicitors’ Files — Preservation and Disclosure WorkstreamLlandough Community Council — 22 October 2026, Item 10: Great House Farm / Tŷ MawrAgent roles — Great House Farm programme
🟦 Evidence & research
Master TimelineEvidence LibraryMedia GalleryRecords Access ChronologySources and ArchivesThe Restoration Campaign
🟥 Registers
Anomalies Register — Lines of EnquiryMissing Records RegisterConstructive Criticism & Counterarguments
🩷 Q&A
Questions and AnswersLegal & OwnershipHistory & the Two ParcelsLand Registry & TitleHeritage & ArchaeologyDemolition & RedevelopmentEvidence, Records & MethodReparations & RemedyHuman Rights & Public LawFamily & Personal HistoryOpen Questions & Research Priorities

Limitation & Procedural Deadline Firewall

This material now lives at https://fcg.bucklerfamily.estate/case/limitation-procedural-deadline-firewall.

Purpose: protect every potentially live legal route before research, complaints, FOI/SAR, archive requests or public campaigning create a false sense that a limitation or court deadline has been preserved.

FieldControl
Potential claim / routeIdentify the specific cause of action, statutory route, appeal, review or complaint.
Potential claimantName the actual person/estate/company with standing; never use “family” as a legal substitute.
Potential defendant / public bodyIdentify the person, company, authority or office-holder legally answerable.
AccrualRecord the earliest legally arguable accrual date and the competing accrual dates.
Knowledge / concealment issueRecord only if supported by evidence and legally relevant to the applicable limitation regime.
Limitation periodDo not assume. Confirm the governing statute/rule and any extension/discretion.
Procedural deadlineRecord appeal, review, complaint, tribunal or court deadlines separately from limitation.
Evidence-preservation deadlineRecord urgent preservation actions independently of the legal deadline.
Last safe dateUse the earliest defensible date until qualified counsel confirms otherwise.
Protective actionState what must be done before that date: advice, notice, application, claim or other protective step.
StatusOPEN → CHECKING → COUNSEL REQUIRED → PROTECTED → CLOSED.

Firewall rule: a complaint, FOI/EIR request, SAR, archive enquiry or referral may preserve evidence or establish a record, but must not be treated as stopping limitation unless the law actually provides that effect.

Create your own website, free on WordPress.com.Create your own website.
Start free

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.