EV-0078 — Amalgamation application and supporting plan (WA231076 item 14)

page · Updated 2026-10-24T07:53:45 · Original source

EV IDEV-0078
TitleAmalgamation application and supporting plan (WA231076 item 14)
Date of document2 February 1987
Typeland registry record
Evidence labelPRIMARY DOCUMENT — NOT PUBLISHED HERE
Repository / referenceHM Land Registry, WA231076 item 14
StatusPENDING — Held by HM Land Registry, WA231076 item 14, marked ‘Open — obtain’. Requested: application, supporting plan, pre/post-amalgamation title extents, appeal correspondence.
ProvenanceCatalogued as FC-004 in the Buckler family evidence repository. No evidence image or source-file link identified as of 10 October 2026.
Wiki catalogue pageFC-004
Claims that rely on thisForensic Evidence Capture — Decisive Document Schedule & Dedicated Placeholders , HM Land Registry — Forensic Assessment, ReOrg

Proves: Not held, so nothing yet. Reported: an amalgamation application and supporting plan dated 2 February 1987 is catalogued at HM Land Registry as WA231076 item 14; Content not yet obtained.

Does not prove: Does not establish pre- or post-amalgamation title extents, documents relied upon, appeal correspondence, or any wrongdoing; Amalgamation is an administrative event.

Interpretation: working hypotheses

Working hypotheses, kept apart from the record above. The record text on this page is unchanged. None of these is a finding: each line is labelled as inference, theory, a reading that cuts against the case, or a discarded theory, and names the evidence it rests on and what would confirm or refute it, so the reader can test it. Updated 25 Oct 2026 (v2: ingredients wording).

Title chain and registration

THEORY · R-02Ground R3: the farmhouse was registered separately (WA240304, Form 1C by Linklaters & Paines, edition 23 Feb 1983) while BP's own 1974 action "has never been finally heard"; the court was told the whole farm had been registered in November 1982. Working hypothesis: the farmhouse application, made with eight-plus years of admitted adverse possession behind her, is the point where the occupation and the unresolved action would have had to be declared.

Rests on: EV-0063 · EV-0065 · EV-0066 · EV-0080 · EV-0078 (this page) · ground R3; research log E91, E98

Would be confirmed by: A Form 1C (Co.) statutory declaration silent about her occupation or claim (subject access request item 11).

Would be refuted by: A declaration that disclosed both. Cuts against: the court's words match the register as merged on 2 Feb 1987, and paper title was never in issue.

Status: Open (ground R3, scores a2 b1 c3 d2)

INFERENCE · R-03The 2 Feb 1987 amalgamation of WA240304 into WA231076 sets a dilemma on the 1983 class of title: either absolute in Feb 1983 (a London Gazette advertisement was required by the rules as printed, and none has been found), or possessory and later converted. Working hypothesis: the class of title in 1983 is a test of how the application was handled. Not yet confirmed for 1987 practice.

Rests on: EV-0078 (this page) · EV-0066 · EV-0231 · research log E114, E116, E118, E120, E125

Would be confirmed by: Subject access request item 10 (the 1983 register edition) showing the class of title.

Would be refuted by: Evidence that the Registry had stopped Gazette advertisement for all land after about May 1975 (the absence found is practice-wide, E116).

Status: Open; turns on item 10 (due 28 Oct 2026)

Cited on

57 pages link here.

Browse mirror index

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.