EV-0269 — TNA WA 9/49 (and WA 9/48, 9/50, 9/54–55, 9/59–63): Land Authority for Wales Board minutes and papers, 1988–1990, covering the November 1988 purchase of sites from Lavernock to Leckwith including plots at Llandough (catalogue entries)

page · Updated 2026-10-21T20:29:29 · Original source

EV IDEV-0269
TitleTNA WA 9/49 (and WA 9/48, 9/50, 9/54–55, 9/59–63): Land Authority for Wales Board minutes and papers, 1988–1990, covering the November 1988 purchase of sites from Lavernock to Leckwith including plots at Llandough (catalogue entries)
Date of document21 October – 25 November 1988 (WA 9/49)
Typearchive catalogue entry
Evidence labelCATALOGUE ENTRY ONLY (record not seen)
Repository / referenceThe National Archives, Kew, WA 9/49; also WA 9/48 (Jul–Sep 1988), WA 9/50 (Dec 1988–Jan 1989), WA 9/54–55 (Sep–Nov 1989), WA 9/59–63 (Apr–Sep 1990). Series note: “many pieces contain maps and plans”. Open (opened 13 Dec 2014).
StatusSOURCE PENDING (not seen)
ProvenanceFree TNA Discovery catalogue, 19 Oct 2026.
Related evidenceEV-0270 · EV-0220

Quotation (verbatim): Land Authority for Wales: Board minutes and papers (catalogue).

Fits with: The Board volume for the weeks when the press reported LAW had “acquired sites … from Lavernock [to] Leckwith including plots at Llandough” (South Wales Echo, 1 Nov 1988). It may hold the purchase approval with acreage, price and plans, and an abstract reciting the 1938 root.

Cuts against: Nothing shows LAW held any Great House Farm land: the farm stayed with BP Properties Ltd. LAW bought from a private buyer chosen by open tender (see the next page).

Notes: Free reading-room inspection at Kew; Sion’s decision.

Catalogued by Cedwyn editors, 20 Oct 2026, from research of 16–20 Oct 2026 (free online sources only).

Interpretation: working hypotheses

Working hypotheses, kept apart from the record above. The record text on this page is unchanged. None of these is a finding: each line is labelled as inference, theory, a reading that cuts against the case, or a discarded theory, and names the evidence it rests on and what would confirm or refute it, so the reader can test it. Updated 25 Oct 2026 (v2: ingredients wording).

The Intercontinental sale motive

INFERENCE · S-01Records on the land's later use, set side by side. The 23 May 1975 conveyance reserved 80-year rights to build roads and sewers across the farmhouse plot "to serve any development of the Retained Land" (EV-0052). In Dec 1986 BP Properties granted a charge to Intercontinental Land & Development Co Ltd (EV-0251); S-02 records it as a commercial relationship, not a dealing with Llandough. In Oct 1988 the BP Pension Fund sold about 1,300 acres in South Wales to Intercontinental Land & Development (Cardiff) Ltd for £29,375,400 after a tender (EV-0093, EV-0270, record, press and company filings). Working hypothesis: a registered title made the land easier to sell for development. Nothing read so far ties the 1982–83 filings to that sale, and S-02 sets out why a pre-arranged sale was discarded.

Rests on: EV-0052 · EV-0093 · EV-0269 (this page) · EV-0270 · EV-0251 · research log E94, E127

Would be confirmed by: The Land Authority for Wales board papers (TNA WA 9/49) or the 1988 sale schedule showing Great House Farm in the package and reliance on the 1983 title.

Would be refuted by: A sale schedule excluding the farm, or evidence that the sale was conceived only after the 31 Jul 1987 judgment.

Status: Open (inference only)

DISCARDED THEORY · S-02DISCARDED (cuts against): the theory that the 1988 sale was pre-arranged before the 1987 judgment. Reason: the Cardiff buyer had its own bank finance from 13 Apr 1987 for something before the BP tender; its BP purchase rests on a contract of 23 Sep 1988 with loans of 28 Oct 1988, after an open tender of about 800 parties. The Dec 1986 charge by BP Properties to the Intercontinental group shows a commercial relationship, not a dealing with Llandough (logged as context).

Rests on: EV-0270 · EV-0251 · research log E127, E129

Would be confirmed by: Would be revived by any 1986–87 document naming BP land in the buyer's financing.

Would be refuted by: Refuted on the company filings read.

Status: Discarded

Cited on

13 pages link here.

Browse mirror index

Small print: dotted links explain a word (see the glossary); amber-shaded links list every name the records use for the same thing.